Journal of Media Studies, Vol 35, No 1 (2020)

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

Facebook As A Public Relations Tool: A Case Study of Kuapa Kokoo Limited

Dennis Sarkodie Owusu

Abstract


Organizations worldwide have realized the need to migrate online if they are to succeed and stay in business. This growing dimension of organizations migrating and doing business online continues to soar on a daily basis. Kuapa Kokoo Limited (a licensed cocoa buying company in Ghana) is one of such organizations which is using Facebook as a public relations tool. The purpose of this study is to examine closely the use of Facebook as a public relations tool at Kuapa Kokoo Limited (KKL). The study highlights the need for the use of Facebook as a Public relations tool and also brings to the fore the benefits and challenges, associated with the use of Facebook as a public relations tool by Ghanaian organizations, using Kuapa Kokoo Limited as a case study. Eight interviews were conducted from the top management executives, the communications department, the marketing department other staff members of KKL. The findings of this study confirm the potential ability of Facebook as a tool for enhancing give and take communication between organizations and their audience as. The study concludes that Facebook holds the potential to make PR more symmetrical.


References


Agnew J, Sindhav B (2009). An e-commerce business model of peer-to

peer interactions among consumers. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 11(2):12-21. Google Scholar

 

Anderson, R., & Reagan, J. (1992). Practitioner roles and uses of new

technologies. Journalism Quarterly, 69(1), 156-165. (p.143). Journalssagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/107769909206900113. Date of retrieval

 

Anonymous (2013). Research Design and Methodology. (Chapter 3).

http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/1796/04chapter3.pf?sequence=5

 

Avery et al (2010). Diffusion of Social Media Among Public Relations

Practitioners in Health Departments Across Various Community Population Sizes. Retrieved on 4th May, 2017.

 

Basingstoke, Hampshire, [England]; New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Perry, M. T. (2005). Diffusion of traditional and new media tactics in       crisis communication. Public Relations Review 31. https://onesearch.library.uwa.edu.au/.../openurl...Diffusion%20of%20traditional%20.

 

Bivins, T. H. (2008). Public relations ethics and the "new" media.  

Excerpted from Mixed Media.http://journalism.uoregon.edu/~tbivins/stratcomweb/readings/PR-new-media.pdf.DATE

 

Bortree D, Seltzer T (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: an

analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3): 317-319. Google Scholar

 

Bowen, S.A (2004). A Practical Model for Ethical Decision Making In

issues Management in Public Relations: Public Relations. Google Scholar.

 

Brown V, Vaughn D (2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: the use

of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26: 219-225. Google Scholar

 

Bryson A, Gomez R, Willman P (2010). Online social networking and

trade union membership: what the Facebook phenomenon truly means for labor organizers. Labor History, 51(1): 41-53. Google Scholar

 

Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2009). The practice of nursing research:

appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. St. Louis, Mo: Saunders Elsevier

 

Caers et al (1013). Facebook; A Literature Review.

 

Caers R, Castelyns V (2011). LinkedIn and Facebook in Belgium: the

influences and biases of social network sites in recruitment and selection procedures. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4): 437-448. Google Scholar Abstract

 

Calvó-Armengol A, Jackson MO (2004). The effects of social networks

on employment and inequality. American Economic Review, 94(3): 426-454. Google Scholar

 

Casteleyn J, Mottart A, Rutten K. (2009). How to use Facebook in your

market research. International Journal of Market Research, 51(4): 439-447. Google Scholar

 

Cheung CMK and Lee MKO (2010). A theoretical model of intentional

social action in online social networks. Decision Support Systems, 49(1): 24-30

 

Cross R, Parker A (2008). The Hidden Power of Social Networks.

Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar

 

Curtis L, Edwards C, Fraser K., (2010). Adoption of social media for

public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36(1): 90-92. Google Scholar

Donald K. Wright, P., & Michelle D. Hinson, M. (2009, March 14). An

Analysis of the Increasing Impact of Social and Other New Media on Public Relations Practice. A Paper Presented to 12th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference. Miami, Floria.

 

Duncan-Durst, L. (2009). Facebook is the new AOL. Retrieved February

4, 2011, from http://www.mpdailyfix.com/facebook-is-the-    new-aol/.

 

Ernst, M. (2010).Rekrutering via social media.Mythes en realiteit.

Brussels: HRMinfo. Google Scholar

 

Graham J, Faix A, Hartman L. (2009). Crashing the Facebook party: one

library's experiences in the studentsPsila domain. Library

Review, 58(3): 228-236. Google Scholar

 

Grunig, L. A, Grunig, J. E.& Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent Public

Relations and Effective Organizations: A Study of Communication in Three Countries. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

 

Jefkins, F. (1986). The Role of Media in Cooperate Public Relations.

(p.7). www.Jefkins1986.com

 

Jo S, Kim Y. (2003). The effect of web characteristics on relationship

building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(3): 199-223. Google Scholar

 

Kluemper D, Rosen P (2009). Future employment selection methods:

evaluating social networking websites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6): 567-580. Google Scholar

 

Kwon O and Wen Y (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting

social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2): 254-263

 

Matthews, L (2010). Social Media and Evolution of Cooperate

Communications. (p.17-20). Vol. 1 No. 1. http://www.elon.edu/docs/e-web/academics/communications/research/02MatthewsEJSpring10.pdf

 

Mooi, E & Sarsted t, M. (2009). A Concise Guide to Market Research.

(p.50). https://books.google.com.gh/books?isbn=3642125417

Parahoo, K. (2006). Nursing research: principles, process, and issues.

 

Polit, D. F., Hungler, B. P., & Beck, C. T. (2001). Essentials of nursing

research: methods, appraisal and utilization. Philadelphia:

 

Lippincott. Roberts, S.J.& Roach, T. (2009). Social networking web sites

and human resource personnel: suggestions for job searches. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(1): 110-114. Google Scholar Abstract

 

Rogers,E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. (p.5).

ww.web.standfond.edu.

 

Shippert L (2009) Thinking about technology and change, or, "what do

you mean it's already over?" PNLA Quarterly, 73(2): 4-26. Google Scholar

 

Sirarmesh, K. (2004). Globalisation and Public relations. (p..271).

www.prismjournal.org.com

 

Skageby, J. (2009). Exploring qualitative sharing practices of social

metadata: expanding the attention economy. Information Society 25(1): 60-72.

 

Sledgianowski, D. and Kulviwat, S. (2009). Using social network sites:

the effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. Journal of Computer Information Systems 49(4): 74-83.

 

Steiner, H. (2009). Reference utility of social networking sites: options

and functionality. Library Hi Tech News, 26(5-6): 4-6. Google Scholar

 

Trusov, M, Bucklin, R.E., Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth

versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73: 90-102. Google Scholar

 

Trusov, M., Bucklin, R.E., Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth

versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73: 90-102. Google Scholar

 

Vorvoreanu, M. (2009). Perceptions of corporations on Facebook: an

analysis of Facebook social norms. Journal of New Communications Research 4(1): 67-86. Google Scholar

 

Waters, R., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., (2009). Engaging stakeholders

through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2): 102-106. Google Scholar www.psych.utoronto.ca/users/tafarodi/

psy427/.../Caers%20et%20al.%20(2013).pdf


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Institute of Communication Studies
University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore - 54590, Pakistan.

E-Mail : ed.jms.ics@gmail.com

Phone No. : 92-42-99231225